Publication Ethics

1. Principles of Transparency and Publication Ethics

ENGINOM adheres to internationally recognized standards of ethical publishing, ensuring transparency, integrity, and accountability throughout the publication process. The journal is committed to maintaining high-quality peer review, clear editorial policies, and ethical handling of all submissions. All published content must be original, properly cited, and free from plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification. The journal promotes openness in authorship, funding disclosure, and conflict of interest declarations, ensuring that research is conducted and reported responsibly.

2. Peer Review Process

All submissions to ENGINOM undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process. Manuscripts are initially screened by the editorial team for suitability, originality, and compliance with journal guidelines. Suitable manuscripts are then assigned to independent expert reviewers who evaluate the scientific quality, methodology, originality, and relevance of the work. Based on reviewer feedback, the editor makes a decision (accept, revise, or reject). Authors are required to respond to all reviewer comments thoroughly and revise their manuscripts accordingly. The journal ensures confidentiality, fairness, and objectivity throughout the review process.

3. Recognizing and Addressing Research Misconduct Allegations

ENGINOM takes all allegations of research misconduct seriously. Misconduct includes, but is not limited to, plagiarism, data fabrication, data falsification, duplicate publication, and unethical research practices. If misconduct is suspected, the journal will investigate the matter following established ethical guidelines. Authors may be asked to provide original data or clarification. If misconduct is confirmed, actions may include manuscript rejection, retraction of published articles, notification to institutions, and banning of authors from future submissions.

4. Contact Information

For all ethical concerns, submissions, or inquiries, authors and reviewers may contact the editorial office of ENGINOM via the official journal email and website. The editorial team is committed to responding promptly and addressing all ethical matters transparently and professionally.

5. Name of Journal

ENGINOM in Engineering Innovations (EEI) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and academic integrity in all areas of engineering research.

6. Conflicts of Interest

All participants in the publication process (authors, reviewers, and editors) must disclose any financial, personal, or professional relationships that could influence or bias their work. Transparency in conflicts of interest ensures the credibility and integrity of the research and publication process.

7. Declaration of Competing Interests

Authors must include a “Declaration of Competing Interests” statement in their manuscript, clearly indicating whether any competing interests exist. If no conflicts are present, authors should state: “The authors declare no competing interests.”

8. Acknowledgments

Authors should acknowledge individuals, institutions, or organizations that contributed to the research but do not meet the criteria for authorship. This may include technical assistance, financial support, or academic guidance.

9. Disclosure of Funding Sources

All sources of financial support must be clearly disclosed in the manuscript. Authors should provide details of funding agencies, grant numbers, and any relevant financial contributions. Transparency in funding helps identify potential influences on the research outcomes.

10. Duties and Responsibilities of Editors

Editors are responsible for making fair and unbiased decisions regarding manuscript acceptance based on scientific merit, originality, and relevance. They must ensure confidentiality of submissions, avoid conflicts of interest, and uphold ethical standards. Editors should act promptly in handling submissions and address ethical issues, including misconduct, corrections, and retractions when necessary.

11. Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the quality of published research. They must provide objective, constructive, and timely evaluations of manuscripts. Reviewers should maintain confidentiality, avoid conflicts of interest, and report any ethical concerns, including plagiarism or data inconsistencies. Reviews should be based solely on scientific merit and relevance.

12. Authors of ENGINOM must confirm the following:

  • The manuscript is original and has not been published or submitted elsewhere.
  • All authors have significantly contributed to the research and approved the final manuscript.
  • Proper acknowledgment of all sources and references has been provided.
  • The research complies with ethical standards and applicable regulations.
  • All conflicts of interest and funding sources have been disclosed.
  • Data presented in the manuscript are accurate, authentic, and can be provided upon request.
  • The authors agree to participate in the peer-review process and respond to reviewer comments professionally.