Investigating the shear flexural behavior of NSM FRP-strengthened RC beams by experimentation and numerical analysis

Ahmed Ali Nasar

doi:10.66632/eei-2026-30

Authors

Ahmed Ali Nasar Department of Civil Engineering, Higher Technological Institute, 10th of Ramadan City, Egypt Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66632/eei-2026-30

Keywords:

Strengthening, NSM, CFRP, Debonding, Concrete cover separation, End Anchorage, Finite element modeling, Fracture energy

Abstract

In recent years, near-surface-mounted (NSM) FRP has become a strong alternative to the externally bonded (EB) technique. Compared to the EB approach, the NSM tech-nology is less susceptible to external damage sources and improves the bond between the FRP reinforcement and the surrounding concrete. However, one of the most com-mon reasons why RC beams reinforced with NSM technology fail is debonding via concrete cover separation (CCS), which begins and ends at low strain levels in the NSM reinforcement. Scientists therefore put a lot of effort into figuring out how to de-lay or prevent this kind of failure. In this investigation, two different bar configura-tions with straight and bent ends were used. The purpose of the bent end is to delay or prevent the CCS failure. A numerical analysis utilizing non-linear finite element mod-eling (FEM) was performed in ANSYS® to confirm the experimental results. Overall, there was good agreement between the numerical results and the corresponding ex-perimental data at each loading level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. S. Zhang, Y. Ke, E. Chen, H. Biscaia, and W. G. Li, “Effect of load distribution on the behaviour of RC beams strengthened in flexure with near-surface mounted (NSM) FRP,” Compos. Struct., vol. 279, no. September 2021, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114782.

[2] S. S. Mohamed, O. Hamdy, M. H. Seleem, and I. A. Sharaky, “The flexural behavior and efficiency of RC beams strengthened with SNSM bars under the effect of several end conditions and material properties,” Eng. Struct., vol. 308, no. April, p. 117990, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117990.

[3] Y. J. Kim, S. W. Hyun, J.-Y. Kang, and J.-S. Park, “Anchorage configuration for post-tensioned NSM CFRP upgrading constructed bridge girders,” Eng. Struct., vol. 79, pp. 256–266, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.022.

[4] W. Ge, W. Song, A. F. Ashour, W. Lu, and D. Cao, “Flexural performance of FRP / steel hybrid reinforced engineered cementitious composite beams,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 31, no. December 2019, p. 101329, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101329.

[5] A. El Refai, F. Abed, and A. Al-Rahmani, “Structural performance and serviceability of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 96, pp. 518–529, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.063.

[6] W. Gang, W. Zhi-Shen, L. Yun-Biao, S. Ze-Yang, and H. Xian-Qi, “Mechanical Properties of Steel-FRP Composite Bar under Uniaxial and Cyclic Tensile Loads,” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1056–1066, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000110.

[7] S. Moolaei, M. K. Sharbatdar, and A. Kheyroddin, “Experimental evaluation of fl exural behavior of HPFRCC beams reinforced with hybrid steel and GFRP bars,” Compos. Struct., vol. 275, no. February, p. 114503, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114503.

[8] A. Palmieri, S. Matthys, and L. Taerwe, “Experimental investigation on fire endurance of insulated concrete beams strengthened with near surface mounted FRP bar reinforcement,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 885–895, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.061.

[9] T. Abdelaleem and H. M. A. Diab, “Suggestions for repairing various defects in the NSM strengthening mechanism with hybrid rebars for RC beams: Experimental and numerical study,” Eng. Struct., vol. 289, p. 116225, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116225.

[10] X. Li, G. Xing, Z. Chang, and J. Huang, “Experimental and analytical study of RC beams strengthened with prestressed near-surface mounted 7075 aluminum alloy bars,” Structures, vol. 48, pp. 1693–1706, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.065.

[11] I. A. Sharaky, S. A. I. Selmy, M. M. El-Attar, and H. E. M. Sallam, “The influence of interaction between NSM and internal reinforcements on the structural behavior of upgrading RC beams,” Compos. Struct., vol. 234, no. October 2019, p. 111751, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111751.

[12] R. H. Haddad and Y. T. Obaidat, “A nonlinear finite element model for shear deficient heat-damaged concrete beams repaired using NSM CFRP strips,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 170, pp. 314–325, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.084.

[13] J. Hwang, D. Seo, K. Park, and Y. You, “Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of FRP Bars by Hybridizing with Steel Wires,” no. June, pp. 365–373, 2014.

[14] M. M. Attia, A. A. El-Latief, and M. A. Eita, “Performance of RC beams with novelty GFRP under the bending load: An experimental and FE study,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 18, no. February, p. e02000, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02000.

[15] Z. Cai, W. Yuan, Z. Wang, and S. T. Smith, “Seismic behavior of precast segmental bridge columns reinforced with hybrid FRP-steel bars,” Eng. Struct., vol. 228, no. October 2020, p. 111484, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111484.

[16] U. Ebead and H. El-Sherif, “Near surface embedded-FRCM for flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 204, pp. 166–176, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.145.

[17] H. Y. Leung, “Flexural behaviour of concrete beams internally reinforced with GFRP rods and steel rebars,” vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 146–157, 2003, doi: 10.1108/02630800310507159.

[18] D. Zhou, Y. Mei, X. Ke, Z. Liu, and W. Xu, “Study on the structural behavior and reinforcement design of openings in subway station floor slabs,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 98, p. 110994, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110994.

[19] M. Adem Yimer and T. Dey, “Dynamic response of concrete beams reinforced with GFRP and steel bars under impact loading,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 161, p. 108329, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108329.

[20] O. Elharouney, M. Elkateb, and A. Khalil, “Behaviour of prestressed hollow core slabs strengthened with NSM CFRP strips around openings: A finite element investigation,” Eng. Struct., vol. 238, p. 112262, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112262.

[21] D. Alwash, R. Kalfat, and R. Al-Mahaidi, “Numerical modelling of RC beams strengthened in shear using NSM FRP and cement based adhesives,” Structures, vol. 57, p. 105217, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105217.

[22] Z. Sun et al., “Experimental study on the fl exural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with bundled hybrid steel / FRP bars,” Eng. Struct., vol. 197, no. July, p. 109443, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109443.

[23] A. A. Shukri, M. A. Hosen, R. Muhamad, and M. Z. Jumaat, “Behaviour of precracked RC beams strengthened using the side-NSM technique,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 123, pp. 617–626, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.066.

[24] S. Ahmed, I. A. Sharaky, Y. E. Ibrahim, and A. Abdo, “Flexural response of GFRP RC beams strengthened with side and bottom NSM GFRP bars,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 18, p. e01858, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01858.

[25] H. Song, Q. Chun, Y. Han, X. Gao, and Z. Cui, “Research on flexural behavior of square and circular cross-section timber beams strengthened with externally bonded and near-surface-mounted hybrid FRP plates,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 451, p. 138742, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138742.